Timeline the Evolution of Submarine Design

The Things They Carried Writing Task - 1107 Words

The Things They Carried - Writing Task By Charlie Evans – Word Count: 1099 Storytelling is the interactive art of using words and actions to reveal the elements and images of a story while encouraging the reader’s imagination. Tim O’Brien the author of the novel The Things They Carried demonstrates storytelling to maximise the significance of story truth versus happening truth and the focus on emotion and feeling, not the events. These main ideas O’Brien displays is reinforced through the choices of style such as point of view, structure, and figurative language. His style is present throughout the entire novel, which includes 22 vignettes that are closely linked by a common experience of the same events and many of the same characters. Style, for O Brien, is an overarching theme of the novel, because these appellations of randomness, unevenness, and lack of definition can be applied to the Vietnam War, which also becomes a meta-textual comment on how stories in this case the actual Vietnam War are received and perceived through storyte lling. The shape or the way the story has been crafted is through a non-chronological, recursive and predictive narration. Each vignette alludes to other vignette intertextually. The change in narrative point of view is in first person of O’Brien but through omniscient narration the minds of the characters are shown but only through metaphors. Story truth versus happening truth is demonstrated by O’Brien through the difference betweenShow MoreRelatedThe Things They Carried By Tim O Brien1621 Words   |  7 PagesTim O’Brien’s use of fictionalized writing in the delivery of â€Å"The Things They Carried† was the best writing style possible for a war story. Fiction, as opposed to a more conventional historical account, allows him to paint a more realistic portrayal of soldiers’ actual combat experience during the Vietnam conflict by use of imagery, real life accounts, and third person omniscient point of view. â€Å"The Things They Carried† is a story that I can personally relate to because of my service in the UnitedRead MoreAn Inside Look At A Soldiers Life in the Vietnam War Essay1346 Words   |  6 Pagesstudents, who could not understand the thought of war, killing, or contend with their friends’ unexpected deaths. From the beginning of the story, O’Brien the author of â€Å"The Things They Carried† uses specific details and illustrations to show readers what the experience was like for the men during the Vietnam war. Among the many things that the men carry were guilt, fear, grief, and stress. Throughout the story O’Brien emphasizes the dreadful events that these men carry with them by incorporating the useRead MoreRecommendations On Improving My Own Interpersonal and Communicational Skills696 Words   |  3 Pagesgood interpersonal skills are easy to be around. They bond with other people naturally, seem to know the right things to say in different situations and make communication in general an easy procedure. Communication skills on the other hand, are the skills in which people communicate through listening, talking, reading and writing. Listening is the first thing that a person learns to do so listening is extremely important to successful managing as not listening could lead Read MoreAnalysis : Growth Through Challenge By The Devil Pups Youth Citizenship Development Program 979 Words   |  4 PagesSara Tarbay (adapted from the Devil Pups youth-citizenship development program) to describe the development of her writing experience over the past few years. Writing has never been her favorite activity to do throughout the day, but the instilled self-discipline in her put there by the Pups has challenged her mentally enough to overcome any obstacle. In overcoming obstacles in her writing, she has established experiences with many literacies, with both good and bad proficiencies that contribute to whatRead MoreThe Things They Carried by Tim OBrien1154 Words   |  5 PagesThe novel The Things They Carried by Tim OBrien begins by Mr. OBrien describing his dramatical events that happened during the middle of his Vietnam experience while he was fighting in the war. Mr. OBrien receive d his draft notice in the month of June in the year of 1968. When he received this notice Mr. OBrien had feelings of confusion, and that drove him to go north to the Canadian border, and it had him contemplating if he wanted to cross it or not because he does not want to be forced toRead MoreUnit 4222 211 - Provide Support to Mobility821 Words   |  4 Pagesdeformities to neurological conditions (ie Multiple Sclerosis). Somebody that is unable to physically move their arms or legs due an disability (such as juvenile arthritis) will have restricted mobility, where they may not be able to carry out day to day tasks and may need assistance. Multiple Sclerosis can affect a number of functions that would ultimately affect mobility, changes in vision could make it difficult to navigate an space safely and effectively, where muscle weakness would make it more difficultRead MoreReview: Tim OBriens The Things They Carried1610 Words   |  6 PagesIn Tim OBriens The Things They Carried, t he main theme is that the young men of Alpha Company carry many physical and emotional burdens which linger on long after the war. As they walked through the jungles and swamps of South Vietnam, they carried weapons, equipment, personal items, and also carried the dead and wounded off the battlefield as well as the guilt for having survived. First Lieutenant Jimmy Cross carried the responsibility for the men under his command and guilt about the war theyRead MoreThe Things They Carried By Tim O Brien878 Words   |  4 PagesThe Things They Carried is more than a story of physical warfare during the Vietnam War, but the battle of inner demons as well. In his novel, Tim O’ Brien takes us deep within the lives of his semi-fictional platoon in the midst of the Vietnam War in which he elaborates upon the harsh realities soldiers faced every day. O’ Brien claims, â€Å"They carried all they could bear, and then some, including a silent awe for the terrible power of the th ings they carried.† We see here that O’ Brien’s main purposeRead MoreWhy Is Sacred Momentum?1458 Words   |  6 Pagesis a kind of pace at which the task is carried out. For most people, the pace and intensity of their work can vary at times. I believe that there is an ideal pace which constitutes the greatest work possible. It is desirable to find this sacred momentum for oneself in every task. To understand what this momentum is, we must first understand what â€Å"work† is. For the sake of this essay, â€Å"work† will refer to the process of directed labor. Work will be effort in a task that has a goal or aim. Work isRead MoreEssay on Four Functions of Management846 Words   |  4 Pagesfour words: Planning, Organizing, Leading and Controlling, which are referred to as the four functions of management. Rohan states, â€Å"to achieve our objectives the four functions of management: Planning, Organizing, Leading and Controlling have to be carried out on an ongoing systematic way for some period of time depending on the type of objective†. (Wickremasighe, n.d.) Planning - Planning implies that we must think through our goals and actions in advance and decide, What to do? and How to do? Planning

Oscar Triplett Case Analysis Free Essays

string(85) " be done unless Triplett performed some act that would make another arrest possible\." Triplett had been in insane asylums before and was released but still considered mentally unstable, which reflects poorly upon the Canadian justice system at that time. At the inquest, various people admitted that they knew he was a danger in the days before he died yet only one person attempted anything and that strikes me as odd. The third discrepancy is why Mrs. We will write a custom essay sample on Oscar Triplett Case Analysis or any similar topic only for you Order Now . Temple was not punished in any way after having killed Triplett. She admitted that her shot took his life, the coroner’s report corroborated with this admission of guilt and yet, she was not punished. Again, there re various reasons that could explain this and I will briefly look at each one. The fourth discrepancy Is how the police force and the detectives appear so uninterested In this case. A proper Investigation did not start until December 17th, 4 days after the death of Triplett. Even after the investigation had begun, there was no urgency to come to the bottom of what really happened. On December 13th 1918 Mrs.. Lois May Temple shot, and killed, James Oscar Triplett in defense of her honor, her life and her daughter’s life. That afternoon Jacob Statesman went to the Temples’ house to make sure that Triplett had not harmed Mrs.. Temple or her daughter in any way. Shortly after Statesman had arrived they became aware that Triplett was at the house. Triplett kept threatening Mrs.. Temple and her young daughter, using obscene language, so both Statesman and Temple pointed guns at Triplett until he exited the house. Triplett began killing chickens in the hen house, throwing them around, until he finally went down to the river. When Triplett returned he climbed on top of the roof and sat there, yelling threats and random nonsense. On her way to the barn Mrs.. Temple shot at Triplett, and both Statesman and Temple thought she had killed him then but they were incorrect. While Temple was at the barn Statesman tried to coax Triplett off the roof, firing four shots in his direction in the process. He eventually succeeded and then began chasing Triplett around the house while Mrs.. Temple was inside. Triplett tried entering the house through the back door but during his attempt both Statesman and Temple shot at him, Temple firing through the door and Statesman firing directly at him. They both agreed that it was Mrs.. Temple’s shot that had killed him, and not Statesman’s shot. For the most part, the statements of Jacob Statesman and Lois May Temple regarding the death of Oscar Triplett were identical. However, there were slight differences that were peculiar. The first noticeable difference was when they were describing when Mrs.. Temple first saw Triplett on the porch. She claimed that she had seen him before she reached the top of the hill and that he had opened the cellar door before Statesman reached the top of the hill. However, Statesman claimed that she had reached the top of the hill Detour seen screamed Tanat Earliest was on near porch, Ana Tanat en Ana wellness’s t opening of the cellar door. The simplest explanation for this difference is that Statesman is smaller than Mrs.. Temple in height and that gives him a different view of the world than she has. Another explanation could be that during traumatic events, small details sometimes become trivial and are forgotten by the person in question. The second peculiarity is the issue of the guns. In both his statements Statesman recalled Mrs.. Temple asking him for help with loading the magazines; in the statement he gave at the inquest he claimed that had to show her how the guns worked and how to fill the magazine. The claim he made during his inquest statement is curious because Temple had already fired a shot before asking him for elf. Another reason it is curious is that Temple never mentioned needing help with how to work the guns in either of her statements. One explanation for this is that Statesman felt emasculated by the whole affair because he was unable to properly protect Mrs.. Temple and her child. Therefore, in his statements he tried to make himself appear more manly and helpful than he really was during the ordeal. The third difference in their statements is how many shots Statesman really fired. In his initial statement, he claimed that he had shot six in total – four whilst he was on the of, one discharge whilst chasing Triplett, and one when Triplett was trying to enter the house. However, during the inquest he only mentioned the last two shots; he said that he had never made it onto the roof, but in his initial statement he claimed he had made it onto the roof and that he had fired four shots at Triplett. Again, this could have been Statesman’s way of fighting the emasculation he felt he had suffered. It is odd that he felt the need to make this claim in his first statement, when Mrs.. Temple never mentioned it in either of her statements. Every person in the community agreed that Oscar Triplett was not a sane man. He had been an inmate in the Insane Asylum at Pomona, but had been released for unknown reasons. It is unusual that every member of the community thought he was insane, and yet only one person admitted to having made any type of inquiry into the reasons behind his release. Dry James Miller bore witness that Triplett was â€Å"a man of unbalanced mind. † He felt that Triplett should never have been released from the asylum because he was a danger to himself and to the community. At the inquest, Dry Miller said that immediately after hearing that Triplett had been released from the asylum, he annotated the Provincial Police to discuss Triplet’s liberty. According to Dry Miller, they told him that nothing could be done unless Triplett performed some act that would make another arrest possible. You read "Oscar Triplett Case Analysis" in category "Papers" Despite Dry. Miller’s personal inquiry into Triplet’s liberty, the authorities did nothing until after his death and after the inquest. Attached to the verdict was a rider that stated that a full inquiry should be made into Triplet’s release from Pomona, and his apparent rehabilitation when he was so obviously insane. James Chalmers had spent 36 hours with Triplett in the days leading up to his death. During this time, he noticed that Triplett was acting in an odd manner; he was restless and talkative, quite unlike himself. Chalmers admitted that after his last interaction with Triplett he was convinced that Triplett was insane, again, but he neglected to inform anyone on the basis that Triplet had done nothing to Justify an arrest. Levi Spangle encountered Oscar Triplett at his (Spangle) residence on the day before Triplet’s death. He claimed that Triplett had walked Insane Ana Immolate Degas teenager toners Ana acting strange . HIS octagons caused Spangle to assume that Triplett was not of sane mind; Spangle left for own immediately after Triplett had departed and reported to the police, but they were unable to locate Triplett. Mrs.. Spangle concurred with her husband’s opinion of Triplet’s sanity. She alleged that Triplet’s actions made her fearful for her life and the life of her daughter. Of all the people who gave testimony at the inquest, Mr.. Spangle was the only one who had notified the police of Triplet’s insanity. It is peculiar that only one person had enough sense to notify the authorities that Triplett could possibly be a danger to others or himself. This is especially peculiar because everyone seemed to agree that he was insane and that he would end up in the asylum again. Triplet’s liberty shows obvious error in the Canadian Justice system at this time, because he should not have been released from the asylum at Pomona. It also shows the misplaced faith that people had in the Justice system, since everyone assumed that the law would eventually step in and apprehend Triplett again, recommitting him to the insane asylum. When Mrs.. Temple was tried for Oscar Triplet’s death, the Jury only took fifteen minutes to reach a verdict. Temple had admitted to killing Triplett and all the physical evidence seemed to corroborate her Tory, yet the Jury verdict was that of â€Å"Justifiable homicide. † The Jury felt that Mrs.. Temple should have been commended for her actions because Triplett was assaulting her in her own home. It is possible that the Jury looked at this case and saw a poor, defenseless woman trying to protect herself and her daughter from a known lunatic. The Jury could have taken pity on her, because she basically had to decide between life and death. Her gender had to have swayed the Jury verdict because it is doubtful that they would have come to the same conclusion if a man had fired the fatal shot. This is so because not only Mrs.. Temple’s life was at stake, but also the honor and the life of her infant daughter. This is very likely because the society at that time was an inherently chauvinistic society; women and men were not seen as equals, and women were considered to have less rights than men. Another possible reason for the lack of punishment is that most people felt that Mrs.. Temple did them a favor by ridding the world of a lunatic like Triplett. Therefore, why should she be punished for making the community a safer, more ordinary area to live in? The police who investigated the death of Oscar Triplett appeared to have little or no interest in the case, and arriving at the truth. A proper investigation into Triplet’s death was not launched until 16 December 1918, three days after his death. Neither the coroner nor the investigating detective from Install arrived until early morning on 17 December 1918. There was no apparent urgency by anyone to come to the bottom of what happened: indeed the detective often took breaks to satiate his hunger and he took his time in pursuing the truth. Constable Marks received a wire on 13 December that notified him of Triplet’s lunacy, but he did not leave for Horrors until the following day. He claimed this was because he required assistance in handling Oscar Triplett, yet he arrived in Horrors alone. Constable Marks alleged that even if he had left for Horrors immediately after receiving the wire, he would not have reached the Temples’ residence before Triplet’s death. It is possible that he felt compelled to mention this because he felt slightly guilty that the case transpired this way; however it shows the town people’s disinterest in everything concerning I reelect – no one put too much effort In along Walt ml. A possible reason Deanna the authorities’ disinterest in this case was because they saw little point in investigating the death of a lunatic. It would be interesting to know whether they would have acted in the same manner if Triplett had been a sane man, even though it is unlikely that they would have been so lax about investigating the case. This lack of interest shows the Canadian Justice system’s predisposition to Judging the importance of various cases based on the character of the victim. Mrs.. Lois May Temple admitted to having killed Oscar James Triplett, and the evidence and eyewitness testimony of Jacob Statesman did not disagree with her. However, the case document of Oscar Triplet’s death had various peculiarities that made the hole affair seem quite unusual. The document shows human error – that of eyewitness testimony; this is a result of the human brain working in mysterious ways. In the event of a trauma some details will remain engraved in one’s memory, no matter how insignificant they are; other details will be blocked by one’s memory as being too traumatic. This was most likely the case concerning Mrs.. Temple and Jacob Statesman. The case document also shows how life worked in remote communities of Canada in the early 20th century. In those years, people were less apprehensive of the criminally insane than people today. If a known lunatic, such as Oscar Triplett, were allowed to roam free in a 21st century society there would be a colossal outcry by the members of society. They would be more outspoken about their fears and trepidation as a result of his liberty than people in 1918 would be. The case document also gives some insight into how the Canadian Justice system worked, especially in remote areas of the country. The Justice system was more lax in those times than they are today, as were the police. They were also more inclined to be biased about issues such as gender when looking at various cases unlike the system n place today, which is generally not allowed to be biased on such things. This is a result of early 20th century societies being more sexist than societies in the 21st century. How to cite Oscar Triplett Case Analysis, Papers

Honesty, the Key Virtue free essay sample

Honesty, the Key Virtue â€Å"It’s a special thing, Like the flutter love brings, And the tune We allow our trust to sing. Without it, we fall apart. Without it, there’s no purpose To our start. It’s what enhances the bond Within humanity. What could this special thing be?† To merely say you love someone and trust someone means nothing. To have found what makes that love and trust last, however, means everything. People cannot simply say they love someone; they must show it. Also, trust is not a bridge that is constructed overnight; it takes time. These two qualities in a relationship are earned, and involve great care and commitment. There’s a problem, though. It’s easy enough to love someone for a while, and to trust someone for a day; but, what makes it last? The practice of honesty makes it last. Honesty is one of the key virtues a human can possess within a relationship. We will write a custom essay sample on Honesty, the Key Virtue or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page With honesty, people can better love and trust one another to their greatest potential. When you aspire to love someone, honesty must be present in your relationship. Whether you are trying to love your parents, friends, significant other, or anyone else, you must be honest with them. By being honest in any kind of relationship, you show respect and the ultimate height of love. To love someone means that you have consciously made the decision to put their needs before your own and help them in any way possible in bettering their life. Honesty is necessary in a loving relationship because it creates unity and level ground where you both can meet. Could you truly love someone who you’ve never been honest with? Also, if you’re not honest with someone you love, can that person trust you, and can you trust that person? When you trust someone, honesty is a critical characteristic you both must have. By being honest with one another, you are creating trust. It is very easy to portray yourself as somebody very different than who you actually are. By trusting someone, you have chosen to take off the mask and to let that person into your world, however secretive you may be. Therefore, if you trust someone, you will be honest with that person. Being honest is so important when you trust someone, because it molds your relationship into the strongest relationship one can havea relationship with trust. Just as easily as honesty creates trust, dishonesty destroys relationships. The most shattering realization is when you realize that someone you love and trust has been dishonest with you. It really makes you wonder why, if the person really loved you, he or she would hurt you by being dishonest. Also, if you have trusted someone, and then he or she returns your trust by later being dishonest with you, don’t you start to second guess the whole relationship? Dishonesty really hurts the love two people have created. Why hurt someone you love? If you love someone, you trust that person. To break that trust by being dishonest must be the lowest form of conduct one could put upon another. Dishonesty is completely unnecessary. Always be honest, and it will result into lasting, promising characteristics of love and trust in your relationships. Although other virtues in relationships are extremely valuable, the quality of honesty is one of the most fundamental assets one can possess. With honesty comes understanding, insight, sensitivity and meaning. In order to create a relationship where there is genuine love and trust, there must be honesty, or else the relationship will not last. If you truly care about someone, being honest with that person should not be hard. Honesty is what enhances the bond within humanity. Always be honest, don’t break the bond you have created, and your relationships will be valuable and last forever.